Wakulla County

Why this score?

Four weighted factors drive the Wakulla County risk score. Methodology is fully documented — each input is public data or a reasoned proxy.

Water infrastructure

Any hyperscale data center in Wakulla County would need a consumptive use permit from the Northwest Florida Water Management District.

The Northwest Florida Water Management District covers the western Panhandle and has the smallest population of Florida's five districts. Groundwater supplies come largely from the Floridan and sand-and-gravel aquifers. Consumptive use permits for large industrial water users go before the district's governing board.

A single hyperscale data center using evaporative cooling can require 1–5 million gallons per day. The Panhandle's lower population density and available industrial land make water availability less of a constraint than further south, but transmission capacity limitations offset that advantage.

Electric infrastructure

Grid capacity and transmission access are the single biggest driver of where hyperscale developers actually site projects.

Wakulla County is served by Talquin Electric Cooperative as the primary electric utility, with Duke Energy Florida covering rural and cooperative-served areas.

Electric cooperatives are member-owned and typically serve rural territory. Cooperatives generally lack the transmission capacity needed for hyperscale loads without significant utility-funded buildout, making cooperative-served areas less attractive to data center developers than investor-owned territory.

State legislative context

Florida's 2026 legislative session produced the regulatory framework that will shape every data center proposal in the state, including any that may come to Wakulla County.

Florida's 2026 legislative session produced multiple bills that directly affect how data centers can be sited and permitted statewide, including in Wakulla County. Only SB 484 became law — Chapter 2026-65, effective July 1, 2026. HB 1007 was laid on the table on March 11 and folded into it. Early versions of both proposed statewide siting restrictions, mandatory impact studies, and minimum setbacks from homes and schools. The enacted law contains none of those. What it does: requires the Public Service Commission to set tariffs ensuring large load customers pay their own cost of service rather than shifting it onto residential ratepayers (utilities must file by October 1, 2026), creates distinct consumptive use permit requirements for large-scale data centers, and eliminates the additional 12-month extension on the public-records exemption for data center projects. It does not ban data centers. The new s. 163.326 states that siting, infrastructure capacity, and land use compatibility "shall be addressed through local comprehensive planning and land development regulations" — the Legislature explicitly left this decision to your county commission. Under existing law (s. 288.075), economic development agencies can already shield project details for 12 months on written request — the mechanism behind code names like Project Tango in Palm Beach County. SB 484 narrows it: it defines “data center,” requires the agency to disclose business activities related to a data center’s location or expansion, and eliminates the additional 12-month extension for data center projects. Twelve months of secrecy, not twenty-four — but twelve months is still long enough for a project to arrive nearly finished.